There is an everyday scandal in the WH, everyday the
administration hands more and more of the country to the oligarchs, and what is
left of our faire land is now "deregulated" for profit. The crisis
before us is America's deeper failure of character, a reckoning with our shadow
that may never happen. But we may yet bring about a pause that thwarts the
current disaster and _appears_ to address our more serious problems. We must make sure that everyday reveals another
Trump scandal. Fatiguing as that is, it
must be part of our daily bread to make sure that their trespasses remain unforgiven.
The Obama Presidency demonstrated perfectly just how far we
are from considering our nation's real divides and needs, and the deeper issue at
stake is our national shadow. No matter amount of virtue in the White House
will "fix" that. But we must address surely our venality, at least
insofar as we attempt to thwart its advance.
Our immediate solution is not a "revolution."
Sorry, but we did that and _this_ is what we have to show for it. A revolution
may sound appealing to some but it is a losing strategy for practical electoral
victories. Those kinds of victories ---pyrrhic and hollow as they may be--- are
what I think we need _first_. Further, revolutions destroy things and that's
the wrong idea. We have enough destruction. The best solution would be
realization, not revolution, but we are not prepared for that.
Our temporary electoral solution is right before our eyes
and that does not depend on any deeper reckoning with the American heart. We
may indeed be able to oust the villains by virtue of mere discontent and rage,
without any unified claim to political values, much less virtue. "Stop
Trump" may well be enough to wrest the power to slow down this fast lane
to catastrophe. We may talk a better game than mere anger and rage but those
emotions may be enough for now. Of
course, we may actually rouse enough anger that we never come near our real
issues but only set them back. But we don't
have in place any of the structures we would need to address our real issues.
The right doesn't want that conversation because it represents the old forms of
privilege and entitlement to which they desperately cling and the left is
failing because it refuses to admit that virtue does indeed require individual assessment
as much as it does structural change.
I would not be opposed to some kind of victory _first_. By
that I mean a directive of the electorate to send Trumpism further back into
its bunkers of ignorance and into the darkness that is its natural habitat. Let
the Balrog go back to its lair. There may be no better remedy for now. As for
us, I say "run, you fools" towards some kind of temporary safety
until we can do better. We can talk about the hard work from wherever we
stand. None of this will stop the
abusers or the racists because our victory will, in fact, energize them too.
But we might outnumber them if the system is not so rigged that it just fails
to represent the majority. That could happen. Our strategy would not provide
real hope because hope requires a future in which there is change--- and real
change requires real reckoning. In the meantime I think we should take _any_
level of pause and reprieve that grants us at least three more years of life.
No, I don't think Mueller's report --- even if it
demonstrates obstruction, perjury, money laundering, or treason--- will move
Republicans to act. Get it through your heads: _nothing_ is too debased or too
corrupt or too morally bankrupt for the likes of Ryan, McConnell, and all the
rest who want reelection and power. Not Collins, not Murkowski, none of them.
The bar for them cannot be too low to protect Trump because they are Trump and
without Trump they will be replaced by Trump. Hannity will decide their
choices. So unless 2018 brings electoral change, expect things to become much
worse, much more rapidly. Is that even possible? We need a short term strategy
because the cure is truly beyond our national reach. If we buy time will the
more honest reckoning begin?
No, it will not. Like I said, that requires the kind of hard work that no one likes. We keep trying to make school “fun” when a lot of it demands plenty that is just hard. It all depends on what you want. And by “school” I mean both school and whatever it is that gives you the skills and the aptitude to do something worthwhile. Excellent things are rare because they are difficult, ask Spinoza.
No, it will not. Like I said, that requires the kind of hard work that no one likes. We keep trying to make school “fun” when a lot of it demands plenty that is just hard. It all depends on what you want. And by “school” I mean both school and whatever it is that gives you the skills and the aptitude to do something worthwhile. Excellent things are rare because they are difficult, ask Spinoza.
Our "ultimate" answer is a process for
realization, not revolution. That realization is one of values and claims, the
ideals and birthright aspirations that have never been realized. But they have been articulated by philosophers,
statesmen, poets, thinkers of all sorts and kinds. Those goals are fundamentally
secular, human, and so fraught with failure and foible under the best of
circumstances. The people who present us
with our ideals, like those who invite us to the hard work, need those things
as much as the rest of us because they too have to live with themselves. And living with yourself, well, that should
be hard too. Sorry. For those of you looking for an ultimate
solution, you've come to the wrong planet. Or you can just retreat to some inner “state.”
The slaveholder Jefferson offered up much of that secular
ultimacy theory; the incrementalist Lincoln looked for a new birth of freedom.
And MLK stood on the mountaintop looking ahead, hoping and believing. But we
will not have realization, or any proximate ultimacy, without reckoning the
shadow. It's not the light we must search for, it's what the light allows us to
see, the shadows it outlines more plainly. There can be no redemption and no
real change without coming to terms with the facts of history; inequities can change
only when we are willing to have the difficult conversations. America has no
stomach for seriousness, much less for learning or addressing the difficult
tasks of personal and community self-interrogation.
Our national shadow begins right around 1619 with the first
settlements that commence the pogrom of the native peoples and introduces as
legal the inexcusable crime of slavery. The implications of those _founding_
actions cast long shadows that require an incandescence of truth that requires
us to burn far more brightly. And then, once we are willing to burn inside, we
would require the maturity not to burn down the outside. Literally. When you
know the truth, it makes you mad. How
could it not? But there is even more
that would have to happen _just to begin_ our national reckoning.
Our collective shadow also requires us to take seriously the
fact that _under the best of circumstances_ the American notion of identity
never fails to invest in tribal ethnic communalisms, religions that divide and
claim moral superiority, and actions that prefer the familiar rather than
Statue of Liberry ideals. What we say we want or stand for is not enough yet to
change our familiar patterns and historical structures. This is a human situation, not just a problem
endemic to we Americans: its easier to take care of your own than to imagine
that your own is everyone else too.
We can describe at any length these failures in terms of
individual responsibilities or of collective and structural inequities--- but
at the heart of the matter involves deeper issues of character and human
nature. We might well have to defy our human nature in order to recast our
character, even to come _near_ to our aspirational values. In fact, I'm pretty
sure that is exactly what we would have to want. To be the humans we _say_ we
want to be we would have to admit the strife that compels us to be better than
how we have been made or how we say we make ourselves. We will not become
better human beings by "becoming who we really are" but rather by
investing in being more than we are, more than nature or culture has taught us
to be.
To nurture those matters of character we must look deeply
into human nature and into a long sordid history of failure rooted in the
incongruity between who we are and what we say we want to be. Such a
conversation puts everything we are familiar with in jeopardy and, more
importantly, puts us face to face with irresolvable facts, facts of nature and
history. This means that our most humanizing ideals put us in conflict with
ourselves and that requires more than an education or achievement or even our
best spiritual or religious aspirations. Love is not the answer. Love is
another indispensable feature of our pursuit of reckoning with ourselves and
that reckoning will include much less pleasant tasks. We're going to need _all_
of ourselves to find _more_ of ourselves. That will force us to make our lesser
angels be just as involved in the conversation with our better.
This week we learned that a Rhodes scholar, Harvard educated
administration official is a serial abuser and that his church counseled his
wife to remain in their marriage. There is no educational achievement or
worldly accomplishment that insures decency or virtue of any kind. We also
heard heartfelt denials of climate change and raging tirades directed at
immigrants ---along with real stories of families being broken up,
deportations, and, of course, more about how all this is making America great "again."
We heard plenty more from Evangelical Christians, praying in
the Oval Office, talking about Trump getting "a mulligan," and about
how ends justify any means, including any admitted abuse, flagrant misogyny, or
vulgarity. Where are their values? Have these behaviors always been their
values? Does that question, that observation, or this kind of invective about
hypocrisy actually matter? What will _change_ people? Not redemption. Not
admission of sin. Learning what we need to learn is going to take much harder
work than that.
We saw too the minority leader Pelosi make a dramatic effort
to draw attention to injustice and to advance the cause of decency only to be
largely ignored except by those who already agree with her. But we heard
nothing much about the structural facts of history, the need for truthful
individual reckonings, or the ways in which our actions inform our values. What
we apparently _cannot_ talk about are the ways we would have to change in order
to realize ---and by that I mean simply _approximate_ something like our
"ultimate" social ideals.
America needs an honest conversation about itself the way
sex needed Dr. Ruth. Whatever happened to _that_ conversation? Porn is free
tells us what we really need to know about that. We humans are not really
interested in what it would take to be an _American_: equity under the rule of
law, generosity and compassion for those less able, the birthright of honest
work, a living wage, health, children, retirement, old age, and a decent death.
I don't say we don't want these things. I say that we are not willing to have
the conversation that would _realize_ these ideals . But that doesn't mean we
can't have something better soon, or even now.
We can buy time. We can arrest some of the decline and
catastrophe even if we cannot stop the end game. If you are serious enough to
say that we might be past the point where human life could stop planetary
destruction, then you might also be serious enough to do what it takes to buy
time and see what more might happen if we just do that. My thesis is simple: we
are not prepared to take on the issues that would cause our society to realize
its stated aspirations and we are not in a situation in which we may be able to
save ourselves at all from planetary self-destruction.
Our solution at present may involve the same lofty optimisms
that proclaim our inner goodness or our hope. This doesn't make them true but
it might provide some important motivation--- especially for those who have
neither the tools nor the willingness to do the actual hard work of
self-interrogation. We're not as a society willing or prepared for that hard
work: it's a calculus we can't do because we aren't willing to do the simple
arithmetic prerequisites.
Our recourse for now is this: use whatever emotional tools
and manipulations we have to buy us enough time to survive this destruction. In
the meantime, _you_ try to do that work to become a person of deeper reflection
and character. Even if you're just buying time. Play music while the deck
chairs show you the ship is sinking? Sure. But make sure that the music you are
playing is looking for lifeboats too, the kind that don't leave out others.
Maybe, just maybe we'll figure out how to have the more
serious conversations we would need to have to create a better world. So far,
that is not happening. Electing Democrats will not change my Republican
neighbor's hearts or minds ---even if the Dems change their lives for the
better with policy. We may have to be "satisfied" with what we can do
until we can do what we actually need to do. In the meantime, don't let the
villains win, don't give up, figure out how to do what Trump does so well: buy
time by pretending or just saying what you need even when you don't have a
clue. The difference we might make could be enough to find a lot of lifeboats.
Take to the task inside yourself but remember that that requires facing the
facts. Time is all we have. Make just a little more for the hard work.
No comments:
Post a Comment